Do you understand your risk? Liability and third-party evaluations in civil litigation.

نویسندگان

  • Liza H Gold
  • John E Davidson
چکیده

Many psychiatrists believe that there is little or no liability associated with conducting examinations at the request of a third party or with providing testimony in civil litigation. Case law has demonstrated otherwise. Psychiatrists conducting independent medical examinations (IMEs) may be vulnerable to tort lawsuits by either the evaluee or the third party who commissions the IME. In addition, breaches of legal or ethical conduct can lead to disciplinary action by state medical boards and professional organizations. Although immunity for certain types of forensic activities is available, such immunity is qualified and may not be applicable to evaluations and related testimony conducted for third parties. Understanding the liability associated with third-party evaluations will assist psychiatrists in minimizing their exposure.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Liability in Third-Party Evaluations for Civil Litigation

Psychiatrists often believe they are protected from liability when conducting third-party evaluations in civil litigation. This belief is based on the understanding that a physician-patient relationship is required for liability to be found and the assumption that no physician-patient relationship is created when examinations are conducted at the request of a third party. Historically, many cou...

متن کامل

Conducting forensic examinations on the road: are you practicing your profession without a license?

Psychiatrists and other mental health professionals retained in civil or criminal litigation are frequently required to travel to a state in which they are not licensed to perform assessments and offer testimony. Adverse professional and legal consequences may await the unwary peripatetic forensic expert. Failure to address local practice requirements may result in disqualification to testify a...

متن کامل

Revisiting impulsivity in suicide: implications for civil liability of third parties.

Previous research and popular conceptualizations of suicide have posited that many suicides are the result of impulsive, "on a whim" decisions. However, recent research demonstrates that most suicides are not attempted impulsively, and in fact involve a plan. Legally, suicide has historically been considered to be a superseding intervening cause of death that exonerates other parties from liabi...

متن کامل

Substantive trial in The Administrative Justice Tribunal

In the new regulations of Administrative Justice Tribunal, substantive proceedings were also brought in the proceedings, which are the innovations of the Code of the Organization and the Rules of Procedure of the Administrative Justice Tribunal. The new lawmaking approach in the new law is the possibility of the complete administrative litigation in Administrative Justice Tribunal, which requir...

متن کامل

Third-Party Actions: A Plaintiff 's Perspective

INTRODUCTION Paragraph 2-406 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure permits a defendant to join a third party who may be liable to him for all or part of the plaintiffs claim against him. , Although paragraph 2-406 pertains directly to actions that may be initiated by defendants, third-party practice poses significant ramifications for the plaintiff in terms of trial strategy and negotiation, ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

دوره 35 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007